Introducing Alternative Dispute Resolution in Criminal Litigation: An Overview
نویسنده
چکیده
This article discusses and analyzes the introducing Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in criminal litigation, which refers to the process of dispute resolution, denotes the idea of making the system of delivering justice friendly to the disputed parties and ensuring quick resolution of the cases. For its simplicity the popularity of this system is increasing day by day. The justice seekers of Bangladesh are frequently harassed in the area of courts. In this respect this system can make them harassment free. Most of the statutory laws including the main procedural law for civil matters follow this system. The ADR System, preferably plea bargaining, should be developed more and more in other main Statutes including the Code of Criminal Procedure. ADR can act a viable option for resolving disputes between the victim and the offender. This overview explores theoretical concerns underlying contemporary appeals to ADR in the Criminal Justice System.
منابع مشابه
Using Case-Based Reasoning to Support Alternative Dispute Resolution
Recent trends in communication technologies led to a shift in the already traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution paradigm, giving birth to the Online Dispute Resolution one. In this new paradigm, technologies are used as a way to deliver better, faster and cheaper alternatives to litigation in court. However, the role that technology plays can be even further enhanced through the use of art...
متن کاملAlternative Dispute Resolution in the Uk Construction Industry
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has attracted a great deal of attention amongst the legal and construction professions of the UK construction industry since the mid1980s. Not only does ADR provide an opportunity to resolve disputes more efficiently than the traditional methods of arbitration and litigation, but it also provides increased scope for the involvement of non-lawyers. Constructi...
متن کاملIs compulsory court-annexed medical malpractice arbitration constitutional? How the debate reflects a trends towards compulsion in alternative dispute resolution.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)1 is a classification of methods used to efficiently, cost-effectively, and equitably resolve disputes2 without resorting to litigation.3 “ADR is premised upon the intention that by providing disputing parties with a process that is confidential, voluntary, adaptable to the needs and interests of the parties, and within party control, a more satisfying, durab...
متن کاملThe Corporate Exploitation of Fundamental Rights: A Nation of Arbitration
This thesis is an in-depth discussion and analysis of the alternative dispute resolution process of arbitration in the United States. It begins by providing a basic explanatory overview of arbitration clauses and the arbitration process. It then goes on to highlight the various benefits over traditional court litigation that arbitration has to offer. From there, the paper presents a detailed di...
متن کاملOverview of Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Primer for Judges and Administrators
Introduction This Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is intended to serve as a practical introduction to the various mechanisms for resolving disputes between parties. It is designed to inform deliberations among judges, justice ministry officials, and administrators who are considering the possibility of adding new dispute resolution options to the traditional adjudicative model ...
متن کامل